4 Blocks Literacy Framework


Four Blocks is a multimethod, multilevel literacy framework developed by Pat Cunningham and Dottie Hall of Wake Forest University and utilized by thousands elementary classrooms.






                                     
4 Blocks Leadership Conference - January 15, 2000
Grades, Tests and Report Cards
presented by Jim Cunningham
session notes submitted by Deb Smith
  
Jim began with the statement, "There is no grading system that will make 4 blocks better, but there is lots of things that will hinder the 4
blocks."
There are several approaches to grades:
  • The traditional-grade-a-lot; average-the grades; and
    let-the-chips-fall-where- they-may system

  • no grades - not going to happen!

  • a checklist of knowledge and strategies for each subject

  • Avoid averaging grades because it forces us to be objective and move away.

In 1920s and 1930s there was a push for getting rid of grades.  Parents
and the public were left with the impression that no grades meant no
accountability.  Parents want to know if they should be worried about
their child's progress.  They want it spelled out to them.  A more
narrative manner is more effective in the early years.  Jim suggests
avoiding giving letter grades for as long as you can.

The checklist has been around along time.  Parents should have a copy of the checklist of what the children can do.  We can't design a checklist
or a list of strategies that explains the curriculum to parents.
Parents don't have the knowledge of the curriculum like the teachers
do.  Parents want to know how well their child is doing compared to
others in that grade.  Parents want to know how well their child is
doing compared to the expectations of that grade level.  Jim really
doubts a checklist can reflect that.

Grades communicate to parents that they think they know how the children are doing in school.

Making changes in the grading policies should be an evolution NOT a
revolution.  Instead of causing an evolution maintain the strengths of
the traditional grading systems but soften, minimize the weaknesses.
Strengths of grades:
  • postpone as long as possible
  • give letter grades -- while remembering that grades DON'T motivate
    young children
  • give a range of grades -- while remembering that if everyone gets an A, then the A's don't matter.  Make sure your best readers and writers tend to get your higher grades and your worst readers and writers tend to get your lower grades - there can be exceptions BUT parents are not going to understand why a nonreader in 4th grade is getting an A.
Grading System doesn't foster learning, but we should have a grading
system that doesn't hinder learning.

BALANCE is the philosophy we can implement.  Balance lets teachers keep
something they think they are already doing.

Grades should reflect:
  • true ability
  • growth
  • (effort) "trying"
Grades are and should be a school wide project.  As a staff you need to:
  • look at the grading policies you have.
  • look at the standardized test scores and compare to the grades. 
  • Are the children receiving inflated grades in their daily grades compared to the standardized tests?
  • Where does the working below grade level label fit into grades?
  • Is an "A" appropriate with a working below grade level attached to it? (We have schools with the HAPPIEST POOR readers you've ever seen!)
Maintain the Strengths of the Traditional Grading System
  • AND give letter grades
  • AND give a range of grades  
  • AND make sure your best readers and writers get the higher grades and
    your worst readers and writers tend to get the lower grades.
Minimize the Weaknesses of the Traditional Grading System
  • Observe and keep anecdotal records and checklists as an alternative to some testing and grading.
  • Writing portfolio for each child as an alternative to some testing and grading.
  • Grade their performance during lessons (S+, S, S-).
  • Legislate a minimum acceptable grade for effort.
  • When testing, test a lot of what you know they know.  80% of the
    tested material should be stuff that the kids should get 100%.  The
    other 20% should be really hard.
  • Use a matrix grading system instead of averaging grades.
  • When grading, permit children to redo work between feedback and
    grading.  80% of your grades should be accessible to all kids who are doing their work.
Curriculum Based Assessment
  • Grading children's performance while they are working.
  • Assessing during application level learning.
Diagnostic Observations
  •  is he paying attention
  • is he getting it
  • nothing problematic
  • something notable
Keep TIMELY records - every two weeks look at what you've collected.

Avoidance of grades averaging forces us to be objective and move
away.  Instead synthesize grades.  Ask did this student earn an A or F?
If no, ask did this student earn a B or D?  If no then the child earned
a C.

  
(Session notes submitted by Deb Smith)
 

4 Blocks:

General Info

Guided Reading

Block

Self-Selected

Reading Block

Working With

Words Block

Writing

Block

4 Blocks:

Related Sites

4 Blocks: Assessment

Kindergarten

Building Blocks

Kankakee

School District Site

Lafayette

Primary Center


This 4 Blocks Site is maintained by Joe Fuhrmann, Kankakee (IL) School District First Grade Teacher at Lafayette Primary Center 

Best viewed in the 800 x 600 display area setting, with Netscape 4.0 or IE 4.0 or higher